Robert M. Wall v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
722 F.2d 1442·14 Fed. R. Serv. 1295·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 198481-7541, 83-7262California1,647 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

Petitioner Robert Mansfield Wall asks us to review two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals. In No. 81-7541, he attacks a. decision upholding an order of deportation issued on October 2, 1979. In No. 83-7262, he attacks a decision denying his motion to reopen. We uphold the Board’s conclusion that Wall is deportable, but we also hold that Wall is eligible for relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), and remand for further consideration of his petition for such relief.

I. FACTS.

Wall, a British subject, entered the United States as a visitor in February, 1975. He married an American citizen on April 28, 1975, and became a permanent resident alien on January 20, 1976. On January 5, 1979, he pled guilty to a cocaine distribution charge under 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Based on that conviction, an Immigration Judge found him deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(ll) at deportation hearings held on October 2, 1979. Wall asked for de ferred action status under Immigration and Naturalization Service Operations Instruction 103.1(a)(l)(ii) on September 24, 1979. The Service’s district director formally denied deferred action status on February 1, 1980. Wall appealed the deportability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.