Tom J. Mcnaughton v. Dillingham Corporation

Good Law
722 F.2d 1459·115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2407·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26719
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 198482-3211California1,584 words

Opinion

Opinion

722 F.2d 1459 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2407 , 99 Lab.Cas. P 10,688 Tom J. McNAUGHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DILLINGHAM CORPORATION, a Hawaii Corporation, doing business as Dillingham Ship Repair, Portland, Oregon; and Local # 1020 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, Defendants-Appellees. No. 82-3211. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1983. Decided Jan. 4, 1984. 1 Paul J. Kelley, Jr., Glasgow, Labarre & Kelly, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Wayne D. Landsverk, Newcomb, Sabin, Meyer & Schwartz, David Cash, Doblie, Francesconi & Welch, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Oregon. 4 Before WALLACE and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and COYLE, * District Judge. 5 COYLE, District Judge. 6 In McNaughton v. Dillingham Corporation, et al., 707 F.2d 1042 (9th Cir.1983), we upheld the application of Oregon's twenty-day limitation period for filing exceptions to arbitration awards, Or.Rev.Stat. Sec. 33.310 (1981), to bar plaintiff's claim against his employer, Dillingham Corporation, brought under Sec. 301 of the Labor Management…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.