United States v. John Waldo Birges, Sr., Terry Lee Hall

Good Law
723 F.2d 666·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26583
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 198482-1744, 82-1761California3,910 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

John Birges and Terry Hall appeal from their convictions arising out of the bombing of Harvey’s Casino [South Lake Tahoe].

Birges was convicted of attempt to interfere with commerce by threats of violence, interstate travel in aid of racketeering, conspiracy, and transportation of explosives in interstate commerce. He asserts three claims of error: (1) that the failure of his attorney to represent him adequately denied him his sixth amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel; (2) that two communications between the judge and the jury, after the jury had retired, constituted supplemental jury instructions, requiring counsel to be informed and defendant to be present; (3) that comments made in closing argument were “harsh and vindictive”, thereby constituting prosecutorial misconduct.

Hall appeals his convictions for conspiracy and transportation of explosives in interstate commerce. Hall submits three points for review: (1) that the evidence presented at trial was not sufficient to support the finding of criminal intent; (2) that the inconsistency of the verdicts rendered by the jury required his motion for acquittal to be granted; (3) that a reference to him as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.