Howard

Howard v. Wells Fargo CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2016D068071California3,113 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/16 Howard v. Wells Fargo CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICKEY HOWARD et al., D068071

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00018390-

CU-MC-CTL)

WELLS FARGO, N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joan M.

Lewis, Judge. Affirmed.

Steven H. Wilhelm and Steven H. Wilhem for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Barton, Klugman & Oetting, Tod V. Beebe and Terry L. Higham for Defendant

and Respondent Wells Fargo, N.A. Howard Agency, LLC (Howard Agency)1 appeals a judgment of dismissal

following the sustaining of a demurrer to its first amended complaint (FAC). The FAC

asserted causes of action against Wells…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.