Harrell

Harrell v. Hanson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2016C078371California6,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 9/30/16 Harrell v. Hanson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

PETER T. HARRELL,

Plaintiff and Appellant, C078371, C079103

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCSCCVPT14671)

MICHELE HANSON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

In these consolidated appeals, Peter T. Harrell challenges an order and amended order granting a special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP motion) filed by defendants Michele Hanson, Patricia Brown, and Sharrel Barnes.1 Harrell filed a petition for writ of mandate against defendants as individuals and

Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. Motions brought under section 425.16 are directed against SLAPP (strategic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.