Gault

Gault v. Sass Electric CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2016D069107California2,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/16 Gault v. Sass Electric CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL GAULT et al., D069107

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00096451-

CU-BC-CTL)

SASS ELECTRIC, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy B.

Taylor, Judge. Affirmed.

Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, John Morris and Rachel E. Moffitt for Plaintiffs and

Appellants.

Smaha Law Group, John L. Smaha, John Paul Teague and Gregory J. Borman for

Defendants and Respondents.

In 2012, Michael Gault and CGE, Inc. (together Gault) sued Sass Electric, Inc. and

Christopher Sass (together Sass) regarding a business dispute. In April 2013,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.