Rafferty

Rafferty v. Suess CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2016A142157California6,120 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/30/16 Rafferty v. Suess CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SUSAN RAFFERTY,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A142157

v. DR. FRED SUESS, M.D. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG13668525) Defendant and Respondent.

In March 2012, plaintiff Susan Rafferty (Rafferty) underwent two procedures to reduce signs of aging on her face. The procedures were performed on the same day by defendant Fred Suess, M.D. (Suess) at the offices of defendant East Bay Plastic Surgery, doing business as Lifestyle Lift (Lifestyle Lift). The next day, Rafferty noticed a mark on her right cheek. When the mark developed into a scar, Rafferty sued Suess and Lifestyle Lift, alleging medical negligence. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.