People v. Summers CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2016A144345California3,662 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/16 P. v. Summers CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A144345

v. KYLE TIMOTHY SUMMERS, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR-645700) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Kyle Timothy Summers appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his probation. He argues the trial court did not have sufficient evidence to find him in violation of his probation because the only evidence offered was inadmissible hearsay. He argues the admission of the evidence violated his constitutional rights to confrontation, cross-examination, and due process. We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In early June 2014, the trial court suspended execution of Summers’s seven-year prison sentence and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.