Cornejo
People v. Cornejo
Opinion
Opinion
Hoch, J.
Filed 10/3/16 (unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, C072053
v. (Super. Ct. No. 11F00582)
ADAM CORNEJO et al., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING PETITION
Defendants and Appellants. FOR REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:
The opinion on rehearing filed September 6, 2016, in the above cause is modified as follows: At the bottom of page 4, add the following three sentences to footnote 3, in the same paragraph:
And while defendants also assert such a confrontation violation would require reversal of their underlying convictions, as well as the gang enhancements, we disagree. The evidence establishing their guilt of the underlying crimes was very strong, as we explain more fully later in this opinion. Setting aside any testimonial hearsay conveyed to the jury through the gang expert, we would conclude beyond a reasonable doubt the jury would have convicted defendants of the underlying…