United States v. Jorge Ausencio Gil-Velasquez

Good Law
669 F. App'x 428
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 201615-50071California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jorge Luis Ausencio Gil-Velasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 96-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand for resentenc-ing.

Gil-Velasquez argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role reduc tion to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). After Gil-Velasquez was sentenced, the United States Sentencing Commission issued Amendment 794 (“the Amendment”), which amended the commentary to the minor role Guideline. The Amendment is retroactive to cases pending on direct appeal. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

The Amendment clarified that, in assessing whether a defendant should receive a minor role adjustment, the court should compare him to the other participants in the crime, rather than to a hypothetical average participant. See U.S.S.G. App. C. Amend. 794; Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 523 . In addition, the Amendment clarified that “[t]he fact that a defendant performs an essential or indispensable role in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.