People v. Roseberry CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2016C079597California2,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/4/16 P. v. Roseberry CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE, C079597

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF142893)

v.

WILLIAM STANLEY PAUL ROSEBERRY,

Defendant and Respondent.

Defendant William Stanley Paul Roseberry appeals from the trial court’s ruling revoking probation. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

An amended complaint filed on February 10, 2015, charged defendant with willful infliction of corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant (count 1—Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a); undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code) and assault with a deadly weapon (count 2—§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), and alleged as to count 1 that defendant personally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.