In re Ricardo D. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2016G052171California1,829 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 10/4/16 In re Ricardo D. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). The opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re RICARDO D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G052171

v. (Super. Ct. No. DL048988-003)

RICARDO D., OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Fred W. Slaughter, Judge. Affirmed. Forest M. Wilkerson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Barry Carlton and Christopher P. Beesley, Deputy Attorneys…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.