Roy Warden v. Bob Walkup

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 201614-16440California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROY WARDEN, No. 14-16440

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:13-cv-01067-DCB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BOB WALKUP, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Mayor; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2016**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Roy Warden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims arising from his removal from a

public park and arrest at a city council meeting. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.