Mary Cunningham V.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 201614-56763California502 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 05 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MARY MARGARET No. 14-56763
CUNNINGHAM,
D.C. No. 8:14-cv-00652-JFW Debtor.
MEMORANDUM*
MARY MARGARET CUNNINGHAM,
Appellant,
v.
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, Putative Assigness of FDIC as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank its assignees and/or successors in interest J.P. Morgan Subsidiary; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2016**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Chapter 7 debtor Mary Margaret Cunningham appeals pro se from the
district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing