Mary Cunningham V.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 201614-56763California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARY MARGARET No. 14-56763

CUNNINGHAM,

D.C. No. 8:14-cv-00652-JFW Debtor.

MEMORANDUM*

MARY MARGARET CUNNINGHAM,

Appellant,

v.

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, Putative Assigness of FDIC as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank its assignees and/or successors in interest J.P. Morgan Subsidiary; et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2016**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Mary Margaret Cunningham appeals pro se from the

district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing

Cunningham’s adversary proceeding without leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.