Damaris De La Rosa-Valenzuela v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
658 F. App'x 346
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 201614-71812California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Damaris De La Rosa-Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review.de novo constitutional claims and questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying De La Rosa-Valenzuela’s motion to reopen in ab-sentia proceedings, where she did not establish that her former attorney’s translation error as to her hearing date was an exceptional circumstance beyond her control causing her failure to appear at her hearing, when the immigration court also sent her a subsequent hearing notice with the correct hearing date after her former attorney withdrew. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (defining exceptional circumstances as circumstances beyond the control of the alien, including battery, extreme cruelty, death, or serious illness of the alien…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.