Doe

Doe v. City of Modesto CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2016F071675California6,114 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Filed 10/6/16 Doe v. City of Modesto CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SHEILA DOE, a Minor, etc., et al.,

F071675

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 2010602) v.

CITY OF MODESTO et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Roger M. Beauchesne, Judge. Alexander Law Group, Richard Alexander, Annie Wu; Law Office of David W. Scopp and David W. Scopp for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Adam U. Lindgren and Blake P. Loebs for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Four-year-old plaintiff Sheila Doe lived with her 26-year-old mother Amanda Doe, who suffered from a bipolar disorder that she treated with Prozac. An incident…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.