Dr. Barry Freeman v. County of Orange
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 07 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DR. BARRY FREEMAN, an individual, No. 14-56511
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:14-cv-00107-JLS-AN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF ORANGE, by and through the Orange County Sheriff’s Department a government entity; BYRON MOLDO, court-appointed receiver; MARC FRIEDMAN, an individual; REBECCA FRIEDMAN, an individual,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 31, 2016** Pasadena, California
Before: SILVERMAN, FISHER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dr. Barry Freeman appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 and negligence claims against a receiver appointed by a California family
court.1 The district court…