Dr. Barry Freeman v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 201614-56511California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 07 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DR. BARRY FREEMAN, an individual, No. 14-56511

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:14-cv-00107-JLS-AN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ORANGE, by and through the Orange County Sheriff’s Department a government entity; BYRON MOLDO, court-appointed receiver; MARC FRIEDMAN, an individual; REBECCA FRIEDMAN, an individual,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 31, 2016** Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN, FISHER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Dr. Barry Freeman appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 and negligence claims against a receiver appointed by a California family

court.1 The district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.