The Warehouse Restaurant, Inc., and Burt H. Hixson v. The Customs House Restaurant, Inc., and Edward Engoron, the Warehouse Restaurant, Inc., a Calif. Corp., and Burt H. Hixson, an Individual v. The Customs House Restaurant, Inc., a Calif. Corp. The Theodore Roosevelt Restaurant Corp., a Calif. Corp. And Edward D. Engoron, an Individual

Good Law
726 F.2d 480
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 198482-4636California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

726 F.2d 480 The WAREHOUSE RESTAURANT, INC., and Burt H. Hixson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CUSTOMS HOUSE RESTAURANT, INC., and Edward Engoron, Defendants-Appellants. The WAREHOUSE RESTAURANT, INC., a Calif. Corp., and Burt H. Hixson, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CUSTOMS HOUSE RESTAURANT, INC., a Calif. Corp.; The Theodore Roosevelt Restaurant Corp., a Calif. Corp.; and Edward D. Engoron, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 82-4636, 82-4663. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 13, 1983. Decided Jan. 31, 1984. Milton Schlemmer, Nancy Martin, Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, Cal., Thomas Small, Robert Schroeder, Fulwilder, Patton, Rieber, Lee & Utecht, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Laurence P. Wilson, Philip L. Pillsbury, Jr., Pillsbury & Wilson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before WALLACE, ALARCON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 Customs House Restaurant and Edward Engoron (Customs House) appeal from a Lanham Act and service mark infringement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.