United States v. Dennis Seybold

Good Law
726 F.2d 502·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 198483-1073California1,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Seybold was convicted on stipulated facts of possessing an unregistered sawed-off shotgun in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d) and 5871. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence as illegally obtained. Sey-bold contends that the affidavit supporting the warrant pursuant to which his residence was searched was insufficient to establish probable cause for the search. We affirm.

I

On June 16, 1982, Seybold was indicted, along with thirty-two other defendants, by a grand jury, The indictment charged Sey-bold with conspiring to manufacture phe-nyl-2-propanone and conspiring to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine. He was also charged with several of the sub stantive offenses in the seventy-three-count indictment. On June 18, a special agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) applied to a federal magistrate for a warrant authorizing the search of Seybold’s residence. In support of his application, the DEA agent submitted a seven-page affidavit which incorporated a copy of the indictment. The magistrate issued the search warrant on June 21, 1982.

The search warrant was executed the following day. Seybold was present at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.