United States v. Elliott Van Brandy, Gardie Shine, and Charles Patterson

Good Law
726 F.2d 548·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25267
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 198483-5082 to 83-5084California1,391 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schnacke, J.

(1) Introduction: Van Brandy and Shine each appeals from a judgment convicting him of conspiracy to commit robbery and of attempted bank robbery. Patterson appeals from a judgment convicting him of aiding and abetting attempted bank robbery. The three judgments were entered after a jury trial. Appellants have, between them presented three contentions on appeal: (a) that their trial was not commenced within the maximum time allowable under the Speedy Trial Act (all three appellants raise this issue); (b) that the trial court erred in not compelling the government to produce an informant file maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (only Van Brandy and Patterson raise this issue); and (c) that Patterson’s conviction for aiding and abetting attempted bank robbery was fatally inconsistent with his acquittal on a conspiracy to commit bank robbery charge (Patterson’s contention alone). None of these contentions is meritorious.

(2) Speedy Trial Act: The Speedy Trial Act [ 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et seq., hereinafter “Act” or “§ 3161”] requires that the trial of a defendant shall commence within 70 days from the filing of the indictment [§ 3161(c)(1) ], unless expanded by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.