13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 365, 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1362 United States of America v. Manuel Frank Rubio, United States of America v. Ronald Harrison Elledge, United States of America v. Donald Duane Smith, United States of America v. John Palomar, United States of America v. Alan David Passaro, United States of America v. Bert Samuel Stefanson

Good Law
727 F.2d 786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 198480-1584California13,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

727 F.2d 786 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 365 , 14 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1362 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Frank RUBIO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Harrison ELLEDGE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Duane SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John PALOMAR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan David PASSARO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bert Samuel STEFANSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 80-1577, 80-1584, 80-1586, 80-1587, 80-1592 and 80-1631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1981. Decided April 14, 1983. Order Dec. 20, 1983. Modified Feb. 29, 1984. Sanford Svetcov, Robert Mueller, III, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for the U.S. Richard B. Mazer, San Francisco, Cal., for Rubio. Arlene West, Oakland, Cal., for Elledge. Du Bois & Hove, Richard E. Hove, Oakland, Cal., for Smith. Judd Iversen, San Francisco, Cal., for Palomar. Robert Carey, Palo Alto, Cal., for Passaro. Ray Archuleta, San Francisco, Cal.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.