Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,936, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,699, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 241 Ernest M. Burgess, Edward H. Morgan, Clarence C. Pearson, John S. Tytus, and Lucius D. Hill v. Premier Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, William L. Brittain, Robert M. Bohlen, C. Gerald Haarer, and Herman L. Schrock, Louis Rosen and R.A. Lile, Substituted for W.E. Darby, Ernest M. Burgess, Edward H. Morgan, Clarence C. Pearson, John S. Tytus, and Lucius D. Hill v. Premier Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, William L. Brittain, Robert M. Bohlen, C. Gerald Haarer, and Herman L. Schrock, Louis Rosen and R.A. Lile, Substituted for W.E. Darby

Good Law
727 F.2d 826
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 198482-3064California7,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

727 F.2d 826 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,936 , Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,699 , 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 241 Ernest M. BURGESS, Edward H. Morgan, Clarence C. Pearson, John S. Tytus, and Lucius D. Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PREMIER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, William L. Brittain, Robert M. Bohlen, C. Gerald Haarer, and Herman L. Schrock, Louis Rosen and R.A. Lile, substituted for W.E. Darby, Defendants-Appellants. Ernest M. BURGESS, Edward H. Morgan, Clarence C. Pearson, John S. Tytus, and Lucius D. Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PREMIER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, William L. Brittain, Robert M. Bohlen, C. Gerald Haarer, and Herman L. Schrock, Louis Rosen and R.A. Lile, substituted for W.E. Darby, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 82-3064, 82-3090. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 1983. Decided March 5, 1984. Ron J. Perey, James A. Smith, Jr., Mark Roellig, Perey & Smith, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees. Theodore J. Collins, Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams, Seattle, Wash., James L. Magee and Bob M. Schwartz, Sax & MacIver, Seattle, Wash., Leonard L. Scott Eichenbaum, Scott, Miller Crockett, Darr & Hawk,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.