Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union

Good Law
2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 866·208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 542·4 Cal. App. 5th 194
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2016B259926ACalifornia11,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bigelow, J.

In September 2014, the trial court issued a permanent injunction barring defendants United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) and Organization United for Respect at Walmart (OUR Walmart; collectively the union) from conducting demonstrations inside stores owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and affiliated companies (collectively Walmart). On appeal, the union contends the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter the injunction because the matter was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.; NLRA). We conclude the NLRA does not preempt Walmart’s trespass action.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2011, the union began organizing and conducting demonstrations at Walmart stores across the United States, including in California. The demonstrations were part of a union campaign designed to induce Walmart to provide its employees with better working conditions and pay. The campaign also sought to pressure Walmart to reinstate employees the union alleged Walmart had discharged or disciplined for exercising their rights under the NLRA. The union publicly indicated it was not seeking to act as the representative or bargaining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.