Coward v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Opinion
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed August 15, 2016, is hereby amended. An amended disposition is filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and McKeown have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Peterson declines to make a recommendation.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en bane are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.
AMENDED MEMORANDUM
Dana Coward appeals the dismissal of her fourth amended complaint against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A, (“JP Morgan”) alleging fraud in the origination of her mortgage loan. The district court dismissed the complaint without leave to amend for failure to comply with the administrative requirements set out in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(13)(D), and for failure to adequately plead fraud under Federal Rule of Civil…