United States v. Nicholas Matheson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 201615-30300California223 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 24 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30300

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:01-cr-00062-WFN-1 v.

NICHOLAS PATRICK MATHESON, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 3, 2016** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Nicholas Matheson appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion to vacate for lack of jurisdiction his 2001 conviction for simple assault in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5). Because Matheson sought to challenge his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conviction more than a dozen years after it had become final, the district court

below did not have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.