Walker
Walker v. Apple, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
Haller, J.
Filed 9/28/16; pub. order 10/28/16 (see end of opn.)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STACEY WALKER et al., D069713
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00012943-
CU-OE-CTL
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald L.
Styn, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of Martin N. Buchanan and Martin N. Buchanan for Plaintiffs and
Appellants.
Carothers Disante & Freudenberger, Timothy M. Freudenberger, Kent J. Sprinkle,
Steven A. Micheli and Teresa W. Ghali for Defendant and Respondent. Stacey Walker and Tyler Walker (together, the Walkers),1 the plaintiffs in this
putative class action against their former employer, Apple, Inc. (Apple), appeal the trial
court's order disqualifying their counsel, Hogue & Belong (the Firm). The trial court
found automatic disqualification was required on the basis the Firm had a conflict of
interest arising from its concurrent representation of the putative class in this case and the
certified class in another wage-and-hour class action…