United States v. Omar Centeno-Sepulveda

Good Law
670 F. App'x 459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 201615-50135California284 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Omar Centeno-Sepulveda appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 21-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

Centeno-Sepulveda argues that the district court erred in denying a minor role reduction to his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). After Centeno-Sepulveda was sentenced, the United States Sentencing Commission issued Amendment 794 (“the Amendment”), which amended the commentary to the minor role Guideline. The Amendment is retroactive to cases pending on direct appeal. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

The Amendment clarified that, in assessing whether a defendant should receive a minor role adjustment, the court should compare him to the other participants in the crime, rather than to a hypothetical average participant. See U.S.S.G. App. C. Amend. 794; Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 523 . In addition, the Amendment clarified that “[t]he fact that a defendant performs an essential or indispensable role in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.