United States v. Jesus Lopez

Good Law
670 F. App'x 454
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 201615-10406California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

The government appeals from the district court’s order granting Jesus Lopez’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand.

The government argues that the district court lacked authority to reduce Lopez’s sentence to 151 months. In light of our recent decision in United States v. Ornelas, 825 F.3d 548 (9th Cir. 2016), we agree. In determining the “applicable guidelines range” under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, the district court improperly considered the downward departure that Lopez received at his original sentencing hearing under section 4A1.3(b). See id. at 554-55. The district court should have used the amended base offense level of 33 paired with the pre-departure criminal history category of III, which results in an amended guidelines range of 168 to 210 months. Although Lopez disagrees with the holding in Ornelas , he concedes that it precludes a reduction of his sentence below 168 months. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A); Ornelas, 825 F.3d at 555 .

This court has already rejected Lopez’s argument that this application of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.