Kai Xu v. Loretta E. Lynch
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anderson Josué Delci-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency found Delci-Perez not credible based on numerous inconsistencies and implausibilities. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination supported under the totality of circumstances). Delci-Perez’s explanations do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Delci-Perez’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).