Gildardo Vazquez-Mendez v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 201614-71255California386 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILDARDO VAZQUEZ-MENDEZ, Nos. 14-71255 15-72521 Petitioner,

v. Agency No. A200-705-932

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Gildardo Vazquez-Mendez, a

native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order

denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying his subsequent motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.