Philip Henshaw v. Dane Field

Good Law
670 F. App'x 563
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 201613-15331California689 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Philip and Barbara Henshaw (Henshaw Parents) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Dane Field, trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Michael and Kimberly Henshaw. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d)(1), and we affirm.

Under 11 U.S.C. § 548 (a)(1), as is relevant here, a transfer is constructively fraudulent, and can thus be voided by a bankruptcy trustee, if: (1) the transfer was made within two years of the debtor’s bankruptcy filing; (2) the debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer; and (3) the debtor was insolvent on the date that such transfer was made. At issue in our case is the December 2009 transfer of Michael and Kimberly Henshaw’s interest in the subject property to the Henshaw Parents. The Henshaw Parents do not dispute that elements (1) and (3) of 11 U.S.C. § 548 (a)(1) have been satisfied—the transfer was made within two years of Michael and Kimberly’s bankruptcy filing and they were insolvent at the time of the transfer. The Henshaw Parents, however, assert that there is a triable issue as to whether Michael and Kimberly received reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.