22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T429,MEMORANDUM Joseph Louis Keys appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging wrongful conduct by defendant, an Orange County Deputy District Attorney, arising from a prior criminal conviction against Keys. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Crum v. Circus Circus Enters., 231 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Keys’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Keys failed to allege facts sufficient to show that his claims arose under federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ; Republican Party of Guam v. Gutierrez, 277 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir. 2002) (“federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s properly pleaded complaint.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.24:T456,

MEMORANDUM

Joseph Louis Keys appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging wrongful conduct by defendant, an Orange County Deputy District Attorney, arising from a prior criminal conviction against Keys. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Crum v. Circus Circus Enters., 231 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Keys’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Keys failed to allege facts sufficient to show that his claims arose under federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ; Republican Party of Guam v. Gutierrez, 277 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir. 2002) (“federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of plaintiff’s properly pleaded complaint.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.