Aristides Soto Mansilla v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
670 F. App'x 447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 201613-74272California259 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Aristides Soto Mansilla (“Soto”) petitions for review ofan order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his application for special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we deny the petition.

Relief under NACARA is unavailable to any applicant who has “incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (b)(3)(B)(i); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1240.66 (a). Soto told an immigration officer that as a sergeant in the Guatemalan military, he informed on suspected guerillas, knowing that they would likely be tortured. After guerillas were identified, the military would send a special G-2 intelligence team, who would take the suspected guerillas to the base to be investigated and tortured. He identified at least some of the suspected guerillas because they “had fliers.” This evidence indicates that Soto was both personally involved in and purposefully assisted persecution on account of political opinion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.