Romero

Midland Funding v. Romero

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 2016JAD16-06California3,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/6/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE

MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, CASE NO. 30-2015-00780720

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00683295)

v. OPINION

MICHAEL ROMERO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Central Justice Center, Timothy J. Stafford, Judge. Reversed and remanded.

Defendant/Appellant Michael Romero appeals the judgment entered against him and in favor of Plaintiff/Respondent Midland Funding LLC in a collection action. Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his objections to Plaintiff’s declaration in lieu of testimony because: (1) the declarant, Kenneth Smith, was not available for service of process pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 98;1 (2) the declaration did not properly authenticate the attached documents, and the business records exception does not apply; and (3) there was insufficient evidence that Plaintiff had standing to sue. For the reasons discussed below, we agree that the declaration did not comply with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.