United States v. Richard Won Cho, United States of America v. Edward L. Harris, Jr., United States of America v. Patrick Anthony Riggans, United States of America v. Murray Evans Laybhen

Good Law
730 F.2d 1260
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 198482-1215California13,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

730 F.2d 1260 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard WON CHO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward L. HARRIS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Anthony RIGGANS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Murray Evans LAYBHEN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 82-1215, 82-1092, 82-1101 and 82-1388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1982. Decided April 10, 1984. Patricia L. Collins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Janet I. Levine, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for Cho. Randy Sue Pollock, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for Riggans, Harris and Laybhen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, PREGERSON, ALARCON, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: 1 This is a consolidated appeal by four youths initially sentenced under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U.S.C. Secs. 5005-26 (1982), whose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.