Arthur Cohn, and Michael Arthur Film Productions, a Company Doing Business Under the Laws of Liechtenstein v. Richard L. Rosenfeld

Good Law
733 F.2d 625·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 198483-5729California2,899 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Rosenfeld appeals from a judgment in favor of Cohn and Michael Arthur Film Productions (Film Productions) on their breach of contract claims. Rosenfeld argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that it erred by awarding Cohn and Film Productions damages for their lost profits. Rosenfeld also claims that the district court abused its discretion by not disqualifying the law firm representing Cohn and Film Productions. We affirm.

I

Rosenfeld is a citizen of California and a distributor of motion pictures. Cohn is a citizen of Switzerland and one of the owners of Film Productions, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Liechtenstein and known as an “anstalt” or "establishment.” In July of 1977 Rosenfeld entered into a written licensing agreement with Cohn and Film Productions. The agreement granted Film Productions exclusive exhibition and exploitation rights to seven full-length films in the German-speaking portions of Europe for a ten year period beginning in March 1979. Rosenfeld received half of the $20,000 licensing fee at the time the agreement was executed.

In December 1977, Film Productions reached an oral agreement to license a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.