International Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, And Reinforcing Ironworkers' Local Union 75 v. Madison Industries

Good Law
733 F.2d 656·116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2422·39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 368·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22469
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 198483-1644California2,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

733 F.2d 656 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2422 , 39 Fed.R.Serv.2d 368 , 101 Lab.Cas. P 11,041 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL, AND REINFORCING IRONWORKERS' LOCAL UNION 75, Petitioner/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MADISON INDUSTRIES, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Respondent/Appellee/Cross- Appellant. Nos. 82-5985, 83-1644. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1984. Decided May 15, 1984. David W. Curtis, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner/appellant/cross-appellee. Paul M. Peterson, Jerome L. Froimson, Jerome L. Froimson, Ltd., Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent/appellee/cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This case concerns the effect of an unresolved attorney's fees request on the finality of a merits judgment. For the reasons explained below, we announce the rule that a judgment on the merits is a separate, final, and appealable decision--even though a request for attorney's fees is involved. FACTS 2 Pursuant to Labor Management Relations (Taft-Hartley) Act Sec. 301, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 (1982),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.