Thomas E. PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
733 F.2d 699·49 Cal. Comp. Cases 814·5 Soc. Serv. Rev. 122·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 198482-5870California818 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marquez, J.

The sole issue for our decision is the constitutionality of the five month waiting period for entitlement to disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1). This presents a matter of first impression. The district court held that the waiting period advanced legitimate legislative goals in a rational fashion and was therefore constitutional. Accordingly it found that Thomas E. Price was not entitled to benefits during the five month statutory waiting period. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

The appellant, Thomas E. Price, filed an application for disability insurance benefits on March 21, 1980. The Secretary found that appellant was disabled as of November 12, 1979, and awarded benefits effective May 1980, the first month after the five month waiting period required by 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a) and (c). Appellant disagreed with the application of the five month waiting period. After exhausting his administrative remedies, appellant brought an action in district court challenging the constitutionality of the statutory five month waiting period.

Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1), requires an individual to meet several criteria…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.