Emmylou Harris, Dba Hannah Brown Music and Emmylou Harris v. Emus Records Corporation Roulette Records, Inc. Suellen Productions, Inc. Admo Music Corporation and Promo Records Distributing Company, Emmylou Harris, Dba Hannah Brown Music Ltd., and Emmylou Harris v. Emus Records Corporation, a New York Corporation Roulette Records, Inc., a New York Corporation Suellen Productions, Inc., a New York Corporation Admo Music Corporation, a New York Corporation and Promo Records Distributing Company, a New Jersey Corporation

Good Law
734 F.2d 1329
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 198482-5613California3,513 words

Opinion

Opinion

734 F.2d 1329 222 U.S.P.Q. 466 , 1984 Copr.L.Dec. P 25,665 Emmylou HARRIS, dba Hannah Brown Music and Emmylou Harris, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EMUS RECORDS CORPORATION; Roulette Records, Inc.; Suellen Productions, Inc.; Admo Music Corporation; and Promo Records Distributing Company, Defendants-Appellants. Emmylou HARRIS, dba Hannah Brown Music Ltd., and Emmylou Harris, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EMUS RECORDS CORPORATION, a New York corporation; Roulette Records, Inc., a New York corporation; Suellen Productions, Inc., a New York corporation; Admo Music Corporation, a New York corporation; and Promo Records Distributing Company, a New Jersey corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 81-5753, 82-5613. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1983. Decided May 29, 1984. Robert W. Woods, Cooper, Epstein & Hurewitz, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Gerald B. Weiner, Fischbach & Fischbach, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Isaac M. Pachulski, Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before GOODWIN and ANDERSON,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.