Digidyne Corporation, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Data General Corporation, Digidyne Corporation, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Data General Corporation, Digidyne Corporation, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Data General Corporation, Digidyne Corporation, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs v. Data General Corporation

Good Law
734 F.2d 1336
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 198482-4162California6,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

734 F.2d 1336 1984-1 Trade Cases 66,053 DIGIDYNE CORPORATION, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. DIGIDYNE CORPORATION, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. DIGIDYNE CORPORATION, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. DIGIDYNE CORPORATION, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 81-4628, 81-4667, 81-4671 and 82-4162. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1983. Decided June 7, 1984. Jack C. Provine, Miller, Starr & Regalia, San Francisco, Cal., for Digidyne Corp. Jack E. Brown, Brown & Bain, P.C., Phoenix, Ariz., for Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. Stephen R. Steinberg, Reavis & McGrath, New York City, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, PECK * and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. BROWNING, Chief Judge: 1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.