22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T4a6,MEMORANDUM Fidel Angel-Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 78-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Angel-Ruiz contends that the district court clearly erred when it denied his request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The record reflects that the court properly compared Angel-Ruiz to his co-participants in the offense, and considered all of the factors enumerated in the commentary to the minor role Guideline. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (2015); United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016). In light of the totality of the circumstances, including Angel-Ruiz’s repeated involvement in transporting drugs into the United States and money back to Mexico, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Angel-Ruiz was not a minor participant. See Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 522-23 . AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.24:T4d3,

MEMORANDUM

Fidel Angel-Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 78-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Angel-Ruiz contends that the district court clearly erred when it denied his request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The record reflects that the court properly compared Angel-Ruiz to his co-participants in the offense, and considered all of the factors enumerated in the commentary to the minor role Guideline. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C) (2015); United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016). In light of the totality of the circumstances, including Angel-Ruiz’s repeated involvement in transporting drugs into the United States and money back to Mexico, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Angel-Ruiz was not a minor participant. See Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 522-23 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.