NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50394

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-07096-DMS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANGELINO RODRIGUEZ-BARCENAS,

a.k.a. Manuel Honorio Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Angelino Rodriguez-Barcenas appeals from the revocation of supervised

release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Barcenas’s counsel has filed a brief

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel of record.

Because Rodriguez-Barcenas has fully served his sentence and is not subject

to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v.

Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th

Cir. 1999).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 15-50394