General Teamsters Local 959, State of Alaska v. National Labor Review Board, National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local 959, State of Alaska

Good Law
743 F.2d 734·117 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2502·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 198483-7767California2,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

743 F.2d 734 117 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2502 , 101 Lab.Cas. P 11,200 GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL 959, STATE OF ALASKA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Cross-Petitioner, v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL 959, STATE OF ALASKA, Cross-Respondent. Nos. 83-7767, 83-7869. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1984. Decided Sept. 25, 1984. James A. Witt, Anchorage, Alaska, for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Susan Williams, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before FLETCHER and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and CRAIG, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 The question on appeal is whether the union's conduct fits within one of the judicially recognized exceptions to the ban against secondary boycotts. The NLRB found against the union and issued a cease and desist order. We affirm. Facts 2 The Odom Corporation, a wholesale distributor of dry goods and beverages, operates two warehouses in Anchorage, Alaska under the name of Anchorage Cold Storage. Before the strike 85% of Anchorage Cold Storage's inventory was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.