United States v. Multi-Management, Inc., and Warren D. Hill, and United States of America v. Multi-Management, Inc., Karl H. Herrmann, Jr., A/K/A Karl Von Herrmann, Warren D. Hill, and Eugene Smith, and Robert Monforton

Good Law
743 F.2d 1359·1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 198484-3003California3,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

743 F.2d 1359 16 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 603 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULTI-MANAGEMENT, INC., and Warren D. Hill, Defendants-Appellants. and UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULTI-MANAGEMENT, INC., Karl H. Herrmann, Jr., a/k/a Karl Von Herrmann, Warren D. Hill, and Eugene Smith, Defendants, and Robert Monforton, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 84-3003, 84-3004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1984. Decided Sept. 28, 1984. K.M. Bridenstine, Polson, Mont., Ann S. German, Keller & German, Kalispell, Mont., for defendants-appellants. Carl E. Rostad, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. Before PECK * , WRIGHT, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Robert Monforton appeals from a judgment of conviction for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , entered upon a jury verdict. Co-defendants Warren D. Hill and Multi-Management, Inc. (MMI) appeal from judgments of conviction for wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 , and conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , also pursuant to a jury verdict. Monforton argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.