Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appellees

Bad Law
751 F.2d 1507·1 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 695·17 Fed. R. Serv. 774·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28603
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 198582-5559California9,665 words

Opinion

Opinion

751 F.2d 1507 1 Fed.R.Serv.3d 695 , 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 774 DAVIS & COX, a partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SUMMA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Chester C. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SUMMA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. SUMMA CORPORATION, Defendant-Counterclaimant/Appellant, v. DAVIS & COX, a partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/Appellees. SUMMA CORPORATION, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/Appellants, v. Chester C. DAVIS, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/Appellees. Nos. 82-5559 to 82-5562. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1984. Resubmitted November 1, 1984. Jan. 18, 1985. R. Gaylord Smith, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant. Robert L. Winslow, Irell & Manella, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant/cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before CHOY and SKOPIL, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.