The City of Springfield, Etc. v. Washington Public Power Supply System, Etc. City of Eugene Bonneville Power Administration, Etc. Peter Johnson, Etc. v. Peter Defazio, Intervening

Good Law
752 F.2d 1423
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 198583-3927California3,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

752 F.2d 1423 The CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, etc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, etc.; City of Eugene; Bonneville Power Administration, etc.; Peter Johnson, etc.; et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. Peter DeFAZIO, et al., Intervening Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 83-3927, 83-4024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1984. Decided Feb. 4, 1985. As Amended April 18, 1985. James C. Clarke, Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland, Or., for Washington Public Power Supply Systems. James T. Waldron, Mildred J. Carmack, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland, Or., for Eugene Water & Electric Bd. Paul A. Gaulker, Atty., Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Charles H. Turner, U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., Dennis G. Linder, Branch Director, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., David E. Lofgren, Thomas D. Miller, Sp. Attys., Portland, Or., for Bonneville Power Admin. John Neupert, Douglas Ragen, William H. Walters, Miller, Nash, Weiner, Hager & Carlsen, Portland, Or., for Washington Utilities Group. William F. Martson, Jr., Barbee B. Lyon, Tonkon, Torp,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.