Ronald Mickwee v. Stephen Hsu, Cal-Comp Electronics, Inc., and Mattaniah Eytan and Kaplan

Good Law
753 F.2d 770·1 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 35·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28715
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 198584-2215California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

753 F.2d 770 1 Fed.R.Serv.3d 35 Ronald MICKWEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen HSU, Cal-Comp Electronics, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Mattaniah Eytan and Kaplan, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 84-2215, 84-2560. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 11, 1985. Mattaniah Eytan, Kaplan, Russin, Vecchi, Eytan & Collins, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Charles W. Craycroft, Mitchell Zimmerman, Fenwick, Stone, Davis & West, Palo Alto, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before SNEED, KENNEDY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 This opinion concerns awards of attorney's fees for proceedings in this court in cases where a party appeals a district court order of sanctions for failure to comply with discovery rules. 2 When the trial court has imposed sanctions for failure to comply with discovery and the order is appealed, as a general rule attorney's fees should be awarded where the discovery order is upheld. Failure to award attorney's fees in such instances would substantially diminish the value of the award made in the trial court and thus frustrate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.