22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T409,MEMORANDUM ReachLocal, Inc. appeals from the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte for failure to prosecute ReachLocal’s diversity action alleging state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992), and we reverse and remand. The district court dismissed ReachLocal’s action for failure to prosecute at a status conference attended by counsel for both parties. In doing so, the district court abused its discretion because it failed to warn ReachLocal of the possibility of dismissal, and did not consider less drastic alternatives. See id. at 273-74 . We deny ReachLocal’s request for reassignment to a different district judge on remand. See Krechman v. County, of Riverside, 723 F.3d 1104, 1111-12 (9th Cir. 2013) (setting forth factors warranting reassignment). REVERSED and REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.24:T43b,

MEMORANDUM

ReachLocal, Inc. appeals from the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte for failure to prosecute ReachLocal’s diversity action alleging state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992), and we reverse and remand.

The district court dismissed ReachLocal’s action for failure to prosecute at a status conference attended by counsel for both parties. In doing so, the district court abused its discretion because it failed to warn ReachLocal of the possibility of dismissal, and did not consider less drastic alternatives. See id. at 273-74 .

We deny ReachLocal’s request for reassignment to a different district judge on remand. See Krechman v. County, of Riverside, 723 F.3d 1104, 1111-12 (9th Cir. 2013) (setting forth factors warranting reassignment).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.