Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Pacific Northwest District Council, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Whisper Soft Mills, Inc., Pacific Northwest District Council, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
754 F.2d 1381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 198583-7717California3,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

754 F.2d 1381 117 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974 , 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3022 , 102 Lab.Cas. P 11,233 WHISPER SOFT MILLS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Pacific Northwest District Council, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenors. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Cross-Petitioner, v. WHISPER SOFT MILLS, INC., Cross-Respondent. PACIFIC NORTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL, INTERNATIONAL LADIES GARMENT WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 83-7717, 83-7813 and 83-7840. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1984. Decided Oct. 31, 1984. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En banc March 11, 1985. Stefan M. Mason, Mason & Mason, Los Angeles, Cal., Sanford N. Nathan, Neyhart, Anderson, Nussbaum, Reilly & Freitas, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Susan Williams, Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the United States National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRILL, ALARCON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: 1 Petitioner, Whisper Soft Mills, Inc., seeks review of a decision and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.