In Re Lawrence Granger and Dixie Granger. Lawrence Eugene Granger and Dixie Lee Granger, Debtors-Appellants v. Ronald Watson, Trustee-Appellee

Good Law
754 F.2d 1490·12 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 194·13 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 837·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29283
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 198584-3579California1,398 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lawrence Eugene and Dixie Lee Gran-ger, debtors in bankruptcy, who together own an equity in their dwelling, appeal from a determination that they are entitled to a $20,000 homestead exemption under Ore.Rev.Stat. § 23.240 instead of the $30,-000 exemption that they claim. They assert that the applicable federal statute provides a double exemption where two members of a household are bankruptcy debtors. 11 U.S.C. § 522 (m). We affirm.

A state may opt not to allow its residents to claim the federal exemptions set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 522 (d). 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(2)(A). A number of states have “opted out” of the federal exemption scheme. Most circuits that have addressed the issue have allowed the states considerable freedom in creating or limiting exemptions for their residents. See e.g., Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In re Pine), 717 F.2d 281 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1711 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); First National Bank of Mobile v. Norris, 701 F.2d 902 (11th Cir.1983); McManus v. Avco Financial Services of Louisiana, Inc. (In re McManus), 681 F.2d 353 (5th Cir.1982); In re Sullivan, 680 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 992 , 103 S.Ct. 349

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.